Best Web3 Community Platforms in 2025: Top 10 Compared (+ Build Your Own)

Finding the right web3 community platform is one of the most consequential decisions for any DAO, NFT project, or token-based organization. The platform you choose determines how members interact, how governance decisions flow, and ultimately whether your community thrives or fragments.

In 2025, the landscape has shifted dramatically. Discord remains the default gathering point, but purpose-built Web3 tools now offer token-gating, on-chain governance, decentralized communication, and quest-based engagement natively. Meanwhile, forward-thinking projects are skipping third-party platforms entirely and building their own white label community platform with real-time communication SDKs.

This guide compares the best community platform options available today for Web3 projects. We evaluate 9 established platforms across features, pricing, Web3 capabilities, and limitations — then show you how to build a fully custom solution with Tencent RTC.

Why Web3 Communities Need Specialized Platforms

Traditional community tools were built for Web2 assumptions: centralized user accounts, email-based identity, and platform-controlled data. Web3 communities operate fundamentally differently:

• Identity is wallet-based: Members prove membership through token or NFT ownership, not usernames and passwords.
• Governance is on-chain: Decisions require verifiable voting mechanisms tied to token holdings.
• Access is permissionless yet gated: Anyone with the right tokens can enter; the blockchain enforces access rules.
• Data ownership matters: Community members expect sovereignty over their interactions, not platform lock-in.
• Incentive alignment is built-in: Token economics connect platform participation to financial outcomes.

These requirements disqualify most generic community tools and create demand for specialized web3 community platform solutions that integrate natively with blockchain infrastructure.

What to Look for in a Web3 Community Platform

Before diving into individual platforms, here are the evaluation criteria we use throughout this comparison:

Token-Gating Capabilities: Can the platform restrict access based on NFT, ERC-20, or multi-chain token ownership? How granular is the gating (channel-level vs. server-level)?

Communication Features: Does it support text chat, voice channels, video conferencing, or screen sharing? Real-time communication is critical for active communities.

On-Chain Integration: How deeply does the platform integrate with blockchain data? Can it read wallet balances, verify transactions, or trigger smart contract interactions?

Governance Tools: Does it support proposal creation, token-weighted voting, or delegation mechanisms?

Scalability: Can it handle thousands of concurrent users without degradation? What about message history and media storage?

Customization & White-Labeling: Can you brand the platform as your own? Is it a white label community platform or does the host brand dominate?

Cost Structure: Free tier limitations, per-member pricing, token requirements, and hidden costs.

Decentralization: Is the platform itself decentralized, or does it introduce a centralized dependency into your decentralized organization?

Top 9 Web3 Community Platforms Compared

1. Discord (Web2 Baseline with Web3 Integrations)

Discord remains the de facto gathering point for Web3 communities in 2025, not because it's the best Web3 tool, but because of sheer network effects. With over 200 million monthly active users and deep familiarity among crypto-native audiences, Discord provides the largest potential reach for any new project.

Key Features:

• Text channels, voice channels, video streaming, and stage events
• Highly customizable with roles, permissions, and channel hierarchies
• Massive bot ecosystem for automation (MEE6, Carl-bot, Dyno)
• Thread support for focused discussions
• Server Boost system for enhanced features

Web3 Capabilities: Discord itself has no native Web3 features. All blockchain functionality comes through third-party bots like Collab.Land and Guild.xyz. This means token-gating requires external verification, wallet connections route through bot interfaces, and on-chain data is only as reliable as the bot's API connections.

Pricing: Free for basic use. Nitro subscriptions ($9.99/month) unlock larger uploads, streaming quality, and emoji access. Server Boosts ($4.99/month per boost) unlock vanity URLs, higher audio quality, and increased upload limits.

Limitations:

• Fully centralized — Discord can ban servers without recourse
• No native token-gating or wallet integration
• Bot dependencies create security vulnerabilities (phishing through compromised bots)
• Terms of service conflicts with certain crypto activities
• No data portability — if Discord bans your server, all history is lost
• API rate limits can affect large-community bots

Best For: Projects that prioritize reach and existing user behavior over decentralization principles. If your community members are already on Discord, the switching cost to a Web3-native platform may not be justified initially.

2. Guild.xyz

Guild.xyz is purpose-built for Web3 access management. Rather than being a full communication platform, it serves as the permission layer that connects blockchain identity to platform access. It answers the question: "Who should have access to what, based on what they hold on-chain?"

Key Features:

• Multi-chain token-gating supporting Ethereum, Polygon, Arbitrum, Optimism, BSC, and 20+ chains
• Role-based access tied to NFT ownership, ERC-20 balances, POAP holdings, or DAO membership
• Integration with Discord, Telegram, Google Workspace, GitHub, and more
• Custom requirement logic (AND/OR conditions across multiple token gates)
• On-chain credential verification without holding user data

Web3 Capabilities: Guild.xyz is fully Web3-native. Users connect wallets to verify holdings, and access rules are defined by smart contract conditions. It supports complex requirements like "must hold NFT from Collection A AND have at least 100 tokens of Token B" with configurable logic operators. The platform reads on-chain data directly, meaning access updates automatically when holdings change.

Pricing: Free to use. Guild.xyz operates on a community-funded model with no per-user fees, making it accessible for projects of any size.

Limitations:

• Not a standalone communication platform — requires Discord, Telegram, or another platform for actual conversations
• No native chat, voice, or video functionality
• Dependent on integrated platforms' uptime and policies
• Complex multi-chain setups can confuse non-technical community managers
• Limited analytics compared to dedicated community management tools

Best For: DAOs and NFT projects that want robust token-gating without migrating away from Discord or Telegram. Guild.xyz excels as an access control layer but requires pairing with a communication platform.

3. Collab.Land

Collab.Land pioneered token-gated community access and remains the most widely deployed verification bot in Web3. Operating as a bot within Discord and Telegram, it automatically assigns roles based on wallet holdings and removes access when tokens are sold or transferred.

Key Features:

• Automatic wallet verification across 15+ blockchains
• Role assignment and removal based on real-time token holdings
• Support for ERC-20, ERC-721, ERC-1155, and SPL tokens
• Tiered access with multiple token thresholds
• Guest pass system for temporary access
• Miniapp Marketplace for extended functionality

Web3 Capabilities: Collab.Land focuses exclusively on the verification and access layer. Users connect wallets through a secure flow, the bot reads on-chain balances, and roles are assigned accordingly. It supports snapshot-based verification (checking balances at specific times) and continuous monitoring (checking at regular intervals). The Miniapp Marketplace extends functionality with tools for tipping, reputation tracking, and cross-community identity.

Pricing: Free tier supports basic token-gating for up to 4 token-gate rules. Premium plans (starting around $35/month) unlock unlimited rules, priority support, custom branding, and advanced analytics. Enterprise pricing is available for large DAOs.

Limitations:

• Not a standalone platform — entirely dependent on Discord or Telegram
• If the bot goes down, all token-gating temporarily fails
• Limited customization of the verification UX
• Users must trust the bot with wallet connection (security concern)
• No governance, voting, or proposal features
• Performance issues during high-traffic token launches

Best For: Projects that want the quickest path to token-gated access within existing Discord or Telegram communities. Collab.Land is battle-tested and widely trusted but introduces a single point of failure.

4. Zealy (formerly Crew3)

Zealy (rebranded from Crew3) approaches community building through gamification and quest mechanics. Rather than passive chat rooms, Zealy creates structured engagement campaigns where members complete tasks to earn XP, climb leaderboards, and unlock rewards.

Key Features:

• Customizable quest system with on-chain and off-chain tasks
• XP-based progression with configurable leaderboards
• Deep Discord integration for role assignment and announcements
• Anti-Sybil measures including proof-of-task-completion verification
• Multi-chain support across 50+ blockchains
• Analytics dashboard tracking acquisition costs and engagement rates
• Sprint campaigns for time-limited engagement pushes

Web3 Capabilities: Zealy connects on-chain activity to community engagement. Quests can verify smart contract interactions (e.g., "swap on Uniswap," "mint an NFT," "provide liquidity"), social media tasks (follow, retweet, share), and content creation tasks. The platform has facilitated over $200M in distributed rewards across 1,000+ communities with 4 million monthly active users.

Pricing: Free tier available for small communities. Growth plans start at approximately $399/month with advanced analytics, custom branding, and higher quest limits. Enterprise plans offer dedicated support and API access.

Limitations:

• Quest-focused — not suitable as a primary communication platform
• Can attract "quest farmers" who engage superficially for rewards
• Requires constant campaign creation to maintain engagement
• Higher tiers are expensive for early-stage projects
• Limited real-time communication features (no voice, no video)
• Engagement can feel transactional rather than organic

Best For: Projects in growth phase that need measurable community engagement and user acquisition campaigns. Zealy excels at community building through structured incentives but should be paired with a communication platform for day-to-day interaction.

5. Galxe

Galxe (formerly Project Galaxy) has evolved from a credential platform into a comprehensive Web3 growth infrastructure. With over 33 million users and 2,700+ partners by 2025, it's become the dominant platform for on-chain credential verification and campaign-based community growth.

Key Features:

• Credential data network aggregating on-chain and off-chain behavior
• Galxe Passport with KYC integration for Sybil resistance
• Quest and campaign system with OAT (On-Chain Achievement Token) rewards
• Starboard analytics combining on-chain metrics with off-chain engagement data
• Earndrop tool for automated token distribution
• zkRaffle for provably fair, zero-knowledge-proof-based raffles
• Telegram Mini App for in-chat task completion
• Support for 15+ blockchains

Web3 Capabilities: Galxe's core strength is its credential network. By aggregating transaction history, NFT holdings, DeFi interactions, and DAO participation into verifiable credentials, it creates a reputation layer that projects can use for targeted engagement. The Gravity (G) token powers governance and transactions across the ecosystem. AI-powered trust scoring helps identify genuine community members versus bots.

Pricing: Campaign creation costs are denominated in G tokens. Basic campaigns can be launched with minimal token requirements, while premium features (Starboard analytics, enterprise support) have custom pricing. The platform takes a percentage of campaign rewards as protocol fees.

Limitations:

• Primarily a credential and campaign platform, not a communication tool
• Token dependency (G) adds cost complexity for campaign creators
• Competition for user attention with thousands of active campaigns
• Learning curve for non-technical community managers
• No native chat, voice, or video features
• Over-reliance on airdrop-hunting users who may not genuinely engage

Best For: Established projects seeking data-driven community growth with verifiable credentials and anti-Sybil protection. Galxe works best as part of a stack rather than a standalone community solution.

6. Huddle01

Huddle01 brings decentralized real-time communication to Web3 communities. Built on Arbitrum Orbit, it offers video conferencing, audio spaces, and live streaming with Web3-native features like token-gated meetings and NFT avatars.

Key Features:

• Decentralized video conferencing supporting 500+ participants
• Audio spaces with up to 20 speakers
• Token-gated meeting access based on NFT or token holdings
• NFT profile pictures and AR avatars
• Decentralized recording storage via IPFS/Filecoin
• Wallet-based login (MetaMask, WalletConnect)
• Media node network for distributed infrastructure

Web3 Capabilities: Huddle01 is architecturally decentralized — communication infrastructure runs on a network of media nodes rather than centralized servers. Node operators contribute bandwidth and earn HUDL tokens as rewards. The platform claims 1/5th the latency of Zoom and 95% lower infrastructure costs through this distributed model. Token-gating restricts meeting access based on wallet contents, enabling exclusive DAO calls and holder-only events.

Pricing: Free for basic use (guest access, wallet login, standard meetings). Node operators invest in media nodes to earn rewards. Premium features including token-gated meetings and advanced hosting are available through token staking or direct payment. The dRTC Chain testnet launched in 2025 with plans for mainnet tokenomics.

Limitations:

• Focused exclusively on synchronous communication (calls and meetings)
• No asynchronous chat or forum features
• Smaller user base means fewer integrations and plugins
• Node network still maturing — reliability may vary
• No governance or voting tools
• Mobile experience less polished than established competitors like Zoom

Best For: DAOs and token communities that prioritize decentralized voice and video communication for governance calls, AMAs, and holder-exclusive events. Not suitable as a full community platform on its own.

7. Towns

Towns represents the most ambitious attempt at building a fully decentralized community platform from scratch. Backed by a16z and built on Base (Ethereum L2), Towns offers end-to-end encrypted messaging with on-chain governance and token-gated access — essentially a decentralized Discord.

Key Features:

• End-to-end encrypted messaging for all conversations
• Token-gated spaces using ERC-20, ERC-721, or wallet-based membership
• On-chain governance via $TOWNS token
• Customizable community spaces with voice chat and NFT galleries
• Open-source River Protocol for developer extensibility
• On-chain social graphs and reputation systems
• Hybrid on-chain/off-chain architecture for Web2-equivalent speed
• 1.6M+ users and 378K+ Spaces as of 2025

Web3 Capabilities: Towns is natively Web3 from the ground up. Smart contracts manage permissions and governance, while off-chain relays handle message delivery at speeds comparable to centralized platforms. The $TOWNS token enables governance participation — holders vote on platform upgrades, content policies, and fund allocations through the Towns DAO. Communities can monetize through subscriptions, NFT sales, and token-gated content with transparent revenue distribution.

Pricing: Free to use for basic community participation. $TOWNS token required for governance participation and premium features. Community creation and advanced customization may require token staking.

Limitations:

• Newer platform with smaller ecosystem than Discord
• Competing with deeply entrenched user habits
• $TOWNS token price volatility affects platform economics
• Limited third-party bot and integration ecosystem
• Learning curve for users unfamiliar with wallet-based login
• Feature set still maturing compared to Discord's decade of development

Best For: Communities that refuse to compromise on decentralization principles. Towns is the closest thing to a "decentralized Discord" and best serves privacy-focused DAOs and projects that want full platform sovereignty.

8. Telegram (with TON Integration)

Telegram's integration with The Open Network (TON) has transformed it from a messaging app into a Web3 community platform with 1 billion monthly active users. The mini-app ecosystem enables DeFi, NFTs, gaming, and community features directly within chats.

Key Features:

• Channels and groups supporting 200,000+ members
• TON-exclusive mini-apps running directly in chat
• Built-in TON wallet (TON Space) for Toncoin management
• Bot API for automation and custom functionality
• Mini-apps requiring no installation (HTML5/JavaScript)
• Telegram Stars for in-app payments
• High-speed blockchain integration (100,000+ TPS on TON)
• Transaction fees below $0.01

Web3 Capabilities: Since early 2025, all Telegram mini-apps run exclusively on TON with TON Connect as the mandatory wallet protocol. This enables token-gated channels, peer-to-peer payments, NFT marketplaces (Getgems), decentralized exchanges, and play-to-earn games — all without leaving the Telegram interface. The combination of massive user base and low-friction Web3 access makes Telegram/TON the most accessible on-ramp for mainstream Web3 community adoption.

Pricing: Free for basic use. Telegram Premium ($4.99/month) unlocks larger uploads, faster downloads, and exclusive features. TON transaction fees are minimal. Mini-app developers monetize through Telegram Stars or direct token economies.

Limitations:

• Telegram itself remains centralized — server-side data storage with no E2E encryption by default in groups
• TON ecosystem is less mature than Ethereum/Polygon for DeFi and NFTs
• Mini-app quality varies wildly — many are spam or scams
• No native voice/video channels comparable to Discord
• Group management tools less sophisticated than purpose-built platforms
• Regulatory uncertainty around TON's history (SEC scrutiny)
• Limited channel-level token-gating without bots

Best For: Projects targeting mainstream adoption or audiences in regions where Telegram dominates (Eastern Europe, Southeast Asia, Middle East). The TON integration makes it ideal for community apps that need frictionless crypto onboarding.

9. Rally

Rally enables creators and communities to launch their own social tokens — branded currencies that grant holders access to exclusive content, governance rights, and revenue sharing. Rather than building on someone else's platform, Rally lets communities create their own token-powered economies.

Key Features:

• No-code creator token minting and management
• Multi-chain support (Ethereum, Polygon, Solana)
• Token-gated Discord channels and Shopify integrations
• DAO governance tools for token-holder voting
• NFT integration tied to social tokens
• Scheduled token unlocks and vesting
• Secondary royalties from token/NFT resales
• 85-95% creator revenue retention

Web3 Capabilities: Rally's core value proposition is tokenized community economics. Creators mint branded sub-tokens (backed by the RLY reserve token) that fans purchase to access exclusive content, vote on community decisions, or earn revenue shares. The platform handles the complexity of token creation, liquidity, and distribution while creators focus on community building. Smart contracts manage token economics, vesting schedules, and governance mechanisms.

Pricing: No upfront setup fees. Costs are transaction-based:

• Ethereum transactions: $1.50–$5.00 each
• Polygon transactions: $0.0001–$0.01 each
• Solana transactions: ~$0.00001 each
• Creators retain 85-95% of token sales revenue

Limitations:

• Social tokens may be classified as securities in some jurisdictions
• RLY token price (~$0.001205 in mid-2025) reflects broader market challenges
• Requires active community engagement to maintain token value
• Legal complexity around token launches and distributions
• Not a communication platform — needs pairing with Discord or similar
• Token value directly tied to creator activity and engagement

Best For: Creators, influencers, and community leaders who want to build tokenized economies around their audiences. Rally works best when paired with a communication platform and is most effective for communities with strong creator-audience relationships.

Platform Comparison Table

Build Your Own Web3 Community Platform with TRTC

Every platform above makes trade-offs. Discord sacrifices decentralization. Guild.xyz requires another platform for communication. Towns is still maturing. Zealy and Galxe focus on campaigns, not daily interaction. None of them give you full control over the experience, the data, or the brand.

For projects that need a white label community platform with complete ownership — your brand, your rules, your data — building a custom solution with TRTC eliminates these compromises.

Why Build Custom?

Full Brand Sovereignty: No "Powered by Discord" or third-party branding. Your community lives on your domain, under your brand, with your UX decisions. This matters for enterprise DAOs and projects where professional presentation drives trust.

Token-Gated Everything: With TRTC's real-time communication SDKs, you implement token-gating at any level — room access, feature unlocks, quality tiers, recording permissions. Connect wallet verification directly to your communication layer without bot intermediaries.

Native Real-Time Communication: TRTC provides the infrastructure that most Web3 platforms lack — high-quality voice channels, video conferencing, screen sharing, and live streaming with sub-300ms latency. This is the same infrastructure powering billions of minutes of communication globally.

Data Ownership: Messages, recordings, metadata — everything stays in your infrastructure. No platform can ban your community, change API terms, or mine your data.

Custom Governance Integration: Wire on-chain voting directly into your communication platform. Token-weighted voice amplification, proposal channels that trigger smart contracts, governance calls restricted to token holders — the integration depth is limited only by your design.

How It Works: Token-Gated Community Architecture

Building a token-gated community platform with TRTC follows a straightforward architecture:

1. Wallet Authentication Layer Connect wallet verification (MetaMask, WalletConnect, Coinbase Wallet) to TRTC's user authentication. When a member connects their wallet, your backend verifies token holdings against your access rules before issuing TRTC room credentials.

2. Real-Time Communication Layer TRTC's SDKs handle the heavy lifting of real-time audio, video, and messaging. The Chat SDK provides persistent messaging with channels, threads, and media sharing. Voice and video SDKs enable live communication channels comparable to Discord's voice rooms but with higher quality and lower latency.

3. On-Chain Verification Layer Your smart contracts define access rules. TRTC's server-side APIs accept webhook callbacks, meaning you can dynamically grant or revoke room access when on-chain balances change. Hold an NFT? You're in the alpha channel. Stake 10,000 tokens? You get video call access. Transfer your tokens? Access revokes automatically.

4. Governance Integration Connect proposal systems (Snapshot, Tally, custom contracts) to dedicated communication channels. When a vote opens, TRTC can spin up a discussion room limited to eligible voters. Results are announced in real-time through the same platform.

MCP Integration for AI-Powered Moderation

TRTC supports Model Context Protocol (MCP) integration, enabling AI-powered community management directly within your custom platform. Deploy intelligent moderation bots that understand context, detect spam using on-chain reputation signals, and provide automated community assistance — all running through your own infrastructure with full data control.

GVoice for Gaming Communities

For Web3 gaming guilds and play-to-earn communities, TRTC's GVoice solution delivers ultra-low-latency voice communication optimized for gaming scenarios. Token-gated voice channels for guild members, in-game communication for holder-exclusive events, and tournament coordination — all with the performance that competitive gaming demands.

What You Get vs. Off-the-Shelf Platforms

Getting Started

The path from zero to a production token-gated community platform:

1. Define access rules: Which tokens gate which features? Map your community tiers to on-chain conditions.
2. Integrate TRTC SDKs: Add real-time chat, voice, and video to your frontend. SDKs are available for Web, iOS, Android, Flutter, and React Native.
3. Connect wallet verification: Use standard libraries (ethers.js, wagmi, web3.js) to verify holdings and issue TRTC credentials.
4. Deploy and iterate: Launch with core features, then add governance integration, AI moderation, and advanced token mechanics based on community feedback.

For a complete walkthrough of building Web3 community applications, see our Web3 community building guide.

How to Choose the Right Platform

The right choice depends on your community's maturity, technical capacity, and decentralization requirements:

Choose Discord + Collab.Land/Guild.xyz if:

• Your community already lives on Discord
• You need the fastest path to token-gating
• Decentralization is a principle, not a hard requirement
• You have limited developer resources

Choose Zealy or Galxe if:

• You're in growth mode and need measurable user acquisition
• Campaign-based engagement aligns with your token distribution strategy
• You need anti-Sybil measures for airdrops or reward distribution

Choose Towns if:

• Decentralization is non-negotiable
• End-to-end encryption is a requirement
• You want platform governance participation
• You're comfortable with a newer, less feature-rich ecosystem

Choose Telegram/TON if:

• Your target audience is already on Telegram
• You want the lowest friction Web3 onboarding
• Mini-app functionality serves your use case
• Geographic reach in Telegram-dominant regions matters

Choose Rally if:

• You're building a creator-led community with token economics
• Revenue sharing and fan ownership are core to your model
• You have an engaged audience ready to invest in your token

Choose to build with TRTC if:

• Brand ownership and white-labeling are essential
• You need enterprise-grade voice and video communication
• Custom token-gating logic exceeds what off-the-shelf tools support
• Data sovereignty is a hard requirement
• You're building a differentiated product, not just a community space

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the best web3 community platform for a new DAO?

For new DAOs with limited technical resources, start with Discord + Guild.xyz for token-gated access. This combination gets you running in hours with minimal cost. As your DAO grows and governance matures, evaluate Towns for decentralized communication or build a custom solution with TRTC for full sovereignty.

Can I use multiple platforms together?

Yes, and most successful Web3 communities do. A typical stack might include Discord for daily chat, Zealy for engagement campaigns, Galxe for credential verification, and Huddle01 for governance calls. The trade-off is fragmented member experience and multiple points of failure. Building on TRTC consolidates this into a single custom platform.

What is a white label community platform?

A white label community platform is a solution you can fully brand as your own — your domain, your design, your identity. Most Web3 community tools don't offer true white-labeling; your community always lives "on Discord" or "on Telegram." Building with TRTC's SDKs gives you a fully white-labeled platform where the technology is invisible and your brand is the only thing members see.

How much does it cost to build a custom Web3 community platform?

The TRTC SDK offers developer-tier access for prototyping and small communities. Production costs scale with usage (minutes of audio/video, number of messages, concurrent users). For most DAOs, the total cost is comparable to or less than premium tiers of multiple SaaS tools combined — with the added benefit of complete ownership and no platform risk.

Do I need blockchain expertise to use these platforms?

Platforms like Discord, Zealy, and Galxe abstract away most blockchain complexity — community managers don't need to write smart contracts. Guild.xyz and Collab.Land require understanding token standards but offer no-code setup. Building custom with TRTC requires developer resources with both Web3 (wallet integration, smart contracts) and real-time communication experience.

Which platform has the best token-gating?

Guild.xyz offers the most sophisticated token-gating logic with multi-chain, multi-condition rules. However, it requires a separate communication platform. For integrated token-gating + communication, Towns is the strongest standalone option. For maximum customization, TRTC lets you implement any gating logic your smart contracts can define.

Conclusion

The best community platform for your Web3 project isn't a universal answer — it depends on where your community lives today, how much control you need, and where you're headed.

If you're optimizing for speed and familiarity, Discord with Web3 bots remains the pragmatic choice. If you're optimizing for decentralization, Towns leads the pack. If you're optimizing for growth mechanics, Zealy and Galxe deliver measurable results.

But if you're building a community that's core to your product — where the platform is the product — building your own white label community platform with TRTC gives you something no off-the-shelf tool can: complete ownership of the experience, the data, and the relationship with your members.

The infrastructure exists. The SDKs are production-ready. The only question is whether your community deserves a custom home or a rented room on someone else's platform.

Ready to build? Explore TRTC's Web3 solutions or start with the Chat SDK to add real-time messaging to your community platform today.